If you’ve ever golfed you know how frustrating the sport can be.
Even if you have a perfect swing, even if you select the perfect club, or hit the ball on the face of the club where you want to, and hit the ball with the right amount of speed if the wind picks up while the ball is in flight, or hits a small divot when it lands it can make your “perfect” shot look terrible.
The same is true when investing.
Sign up to our mailing list here and get 5 Free Gifts that will help you evaluate stocks better and faster. One of these allowed me to evaluate 3,943 stocks in 40 days manually... And I want you to have it for free.
If you evaluate a company and decide after researching it for more than 100 hours that it’s undervalued, it has great margins, it has produced a ton of cash, and has little to no debt, so you buy it…
Then a major competitor has a breakthrough innovation that derails your company’s business, or your company has a small problem that turns out to be big later: these kinds of things can derail your entire investment thesis.
The inverse is also true.
If you evaluate a company and find after putting a ton of time into it that it doesn’t fit your required investment thesis so you pass on it. Then it gets bought out at a premium and you feel like you did something wrong.
If you love golf or investing you have to learn to deal with these kinds of situations or you’ll drive yourself crazy.
In golf and investing there is no such thing as playing well – or doing things right – every time.
Even when Tiger Woods was at his best during the 2000 PGA Tour season he ‘only’ won 9 of 20 tournaments he entered, or a 45% success rate during his best career year.
When investing and something goes against your investment thesis it pays to remember this, and also the following quote by investment great Peter Lynch.
But even if the market – or some insane company – proves your investment thesis wrong in a short time, the decision you made can still be the right one.
Why Am I Still Right on KING
In June and July 2015 I did a case study on Candy Crush Saga maker King Digital Entertainment (KING) at the request of a reader.
At the end of the case study, I found out that, even though they had great margins and produced a ton of cash, that they had major risks keeping me from buying into them.
Want to learn how to find, evaluate, value, and buy great stocks fast? Ones that have helped me produce average annual investment returns of 23.5% per year on average in the first 9 years of my career? Click here to learn more about our Value Investing Masterclass.
For those who want to read my thoughts on KING go here.
For those who don’t know the major issues were, here are the following:
- KING could reprice options
- It paid company insiders way too much
- It had the most complicated share structure I’ve ever seen
- It had some related party transactions that were nefarious
Any of the above by itself is bad enough to keep me from investing, but all four combined would keep me as far away from the company as possible.
I remain comfortable with this decision even after Activision announced it’s buying KING out for $5.9 billion today.
Why? Because the price Activision paid for KING is insane.
Using just one example, Activision paid $2 billion more for KING than what Disney paid ($4 billion) for Star Wars in 2012.
Does anyone on Earth think Candy Crush, Farm Hero Saga, and KING’s various other games and community are more valuable than Star Wars?
But this isn’t the main reason I remain comfortable with the decision I made in July 2015.
Developing Your Investment Processes
When I began investing I took each investment decision on a case by case basis. I had no strict buy or sell criteria, and every investment decision I made relied on how I felt on that particular day.
This meant most of my decision-making process relied on emotion – the last thing you want to rely on as an investor.
Relying on emotional whims early led to lost money. Lost opportunity. More stress.
The more I learned the more I realized I needed to develop a strict buy and sell investment criteria to take emotion out of the equation.
Over time this led to my preliminary analysis checklist. My selling checklist and my general investment checklist, to name a few. These are why I’m comfortable ‘losing’ out on a 26% gain in a few months.
Just because Activision is willing to waste money, and yes there is a great likelihood the money they spent on KING will get wasted, it doesn’t mean my decision in June and July was the wrong one.
Why?
Because I stuck to my investment thought processes…
Owning KING involved taking on too many major red flags so I decided to pass. I wouldn’t have bought into the company at any price barring an NCAV situation.
Before developing my investment thought processes, when seeing the KING buy out, it would have frustrated me. Why? Because it was at a 26% premium to what I could have bought them for in June or July.
This would have made me feel like I lost a quick and easy 26% opportunity.
But this makes no sense.
How could I have known KING was going to be bought out in a few months’ time? How could I have known Activision would pay such a high price for KING?
I couldn’t. So why dwell on what I couldn’t have known. I don’t know and instead, I rely on what my research and processes told me at the time.
I may have been ‘wrong’ in the short-term this time, but next time the company could go bankrupt. Could get investigated by the SEC for fraud, or could lose all its subscribers in a short time. All would be disasters for shareholders.
If done right, investing shouldn’t be gambling. Buying KING would have been just that. This is why even though I was wrong, I was still right about KING.
Have you developed your own investment processes? Do you require strict criteria to be met for any buy or sell decisions? Would you have regretted not buying KING? Let me know your thoughts on all in the comments below.
***
P.S. If you’re interested in seeing some of my investment checklists you can sign up here to get them for free.